Publications
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://192.9.200.215:4000/handle/123456789/196
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Participatory Research, Educational Experience and Empowerment of Adults(Society for Participatory Research in Asia, 1985-01) Tandon, RajeshThe last three decades have seen an increasingly diverse range of models and theories of social change. The implementation of these models in developing countries like India have brought mixed results. While some improvements for example, in overall agricultural production has taken place, the situation of more than half the rural population has not improved, if not worsened. Starting from community development in the 50s as the basic pro-gramme for changing the situation in rural India, we now have people-centred models of development. These models emphasise the principle of people's participation in developing themselves.Item Participatory Research for Adult Education and Literacy: Guidelines for Practitioners(International Council for Adult Education (ICAE), 1980-08) Tandon, Rajesh; Barndt, Deborah; Schutter, Anton de; Mustafa, Kemal; Wessel, Mathias; Hall, Budd LThis document outlines guidelines for participatory research in adult education and literacy, emphasizing learner participation in the conception, implementation, and evaluation of programs. It stems from the deliberations at the International Forum on Participatory Research (April 1980) in Ljubljana, Yugoslavia, sponsored by UNESCO and the International Council for Adult Education (ICAE). These guidelines synthesize contributions from international practitioners and provide a framework for promoting participatory research as an approach to socio-economic development and educational empowerment.Item Participatory Rural Appraisal - A Critique(SEARCH NEWS, 1991) Tandon, RajeshThis document provides a critique of the Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) method, which emerged from Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA). It discusses the implications of these approaches on rural development, with a focus on their use in planning and monitoring development programs. The critique highlights the limitations of PRA, particularly its reliance on rapid and non-statistical data collection methods, and questions the extent to which it serves the local communities' interests. The paper emphasizes the need for deeper understanding and critical analysis of local realities in the development process.